FET\u00d6 \u00fcyeli\u011finden 8 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan FET\u00d6’n\u00fcn k\u0131demli avukatlar\u0131ndan Mehmet Rasim Kuseyri’nin, hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek tahliye olma talebi A\u0130HM taraf\u0131ndan reddedildi.<\/p>\n

FET\u00d6 finans\u00f6rlerinden Hamdi Ak\u0131n \u0130pek’in avukat\u0131 ve Bylock arkada\u015f\u0131 olan Kuseyri, kanser olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen cezaevinde tedavi olmak istememi\u015f ve tahliye talebinde bulunmu\u015ftu. Kuseyri \u00f6nce Anayasa Mahkemesine sonra da A\u0130HM’e\u00a0 “hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na ra\u011fmen cezaevinde tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n, hayat\u0131 ve sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tehlike olu\u015fturdu\u011funu”\u00a0 iddias\u0131yla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.\u00a0 A\u0130HM\u00a0 Kuseyri’nin iddias\u0131n\u0131 reddetti.<\/p>\n

Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi (A\u0130HM), daha \u00f6nce tedbiren tahliye talebini reddetti\u011fi Fetullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc (FET\u00d6) \u00fcyeli\u011finden hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan avukat Mehmet Rasim Kuseyri’nin ba\u015fvurusunu kabul edilemez buldu.<\/p>\n

Ankara Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen FET\u00d6 soru\u015fturmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda 2016’da tutuklanan ve Sincan Cezaevi’ne konulan Kuseyri, rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden ge\u00e7en y\u0131l may\u0131s ay\u0131nda Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca hastaneye yat\u0131r\u0131larak gerekli tedaviyi almas\u0131 ve operasyon ge\u00e7irmesi sa\u011fland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 ge\u00e7en operasyonun ard\u0131ndan Kuseyri’nin t\u0131bbi kontrolleri \u00f6zenle takip edilerek doktorlar taraf\u0131ndan kemoterapi almas\u0131 \u00f6nerildi ancak Kuseyri ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7ta kemoterapi almay\u0131 reddetti ve yarg\u0131lamas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcten mahkemeden tahliyesini istedi.<\/p>\n

Tahliye talebi, hastanelerin y\u00fcksek g\u00fcvenlikli k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131nda gerekli tedaviyi alabilece\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle reddedildi. Bunun \u00fczerine Kuseyri, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapora istinaden tahliye edilmesi gerekti\u011fini ileri s\u00fcrerek, Anayasa Mahkemesine ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n

Anayasa Mahkemesinin tedbir karar\u0131 \u00fczerine Kuseyri’nin t\u00fcm t\u0131bbi tedavileri eksiksiz almas\u0131 konusunda gerekenler yap\u0131ld\u0131 ve bir\u00e7ok kez Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m Beyaz\u0131t Hastanesi Onkoloji Klini\u011fi’nde muayene edildi. Uzman doktorlarca cezaevinde kalmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tehlike olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnde d\u00fczenlenen raporlara ra\u011fmen Kuseyri, bu kez de A\u0130HM’e ba\u015fvurdu.<\/p>\n

A\u0130HM, ilk olarak Kuseyri’nin tedbiren tahliye talebini ele ald\u0131. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 da Kuseyri’nin rahats\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fi olan t\u00fcm t\u0131bbi tedavileri alan\u0131nda uzman doktorlar\u0131n g\u00f6revli bulundu\u011fu hastanede ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bilgileri A\u0130HM’e sundu.<\/p>\n

\u00d6nce tedbiren tahliye talebi, sonra ba\u015fvurunun tamam\u0131 reddedildi<\/strong><\/p>\n

A\u0130HM ise Anayasa Mahkemesinin yeni bir tedbir karar\u0131 verip vermedi\u011fi konusunda ek bilgi istedi. Bu s\u0131rada, Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m Beyaz\u0131t Hastanesi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen raporlar\u0131 dikkate alan Anayasa Mahkemesi, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n cezaevinde kalmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan tehlike olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna vard\u0131\u011f\u0131 yeni bir tedbir karar\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n

Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ikinci kez verdi\u011fi bilgiler \u00fczerine A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvuran\u0131n sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir tehlike olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanaatine vararak tedbiren tahliye talebini 12 Aral\u0131k 2019’da reddetti.<\/p>\n

Tedbiren tahliye talebinin karara ba\u011flanmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan A\u0130HM, ba\u015fvurunun tamam\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirdi. A\u0130HM, h\u00fck\u00fcmet ad\u0131na Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131nca sunulan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fc de dikkate alarak i\u00e7 hukuk yollar\u0131n\u0131n t\u00fcketilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131 nedeniyle ba\u015fvuruyu kabul edilemez buldu.<\/p>\n

FET\u00d6’n\u00fcn k\u0131demli avukatlar\u0131ndan\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

FET\u00d6’n\u00fcn s\u00f6zde yarg\u0131 imam\u0131 oldu\u011fu iddia edilen Mehmet Rasim Kuseyri, FET\u00d6’n\u00fcn avukat yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin davada \u00f6rg\u00fct \u00fcyeli\u011finden 8 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda, Kuseyri’nin, avukatl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn tepe y\u00f6neticilerinden firari Ak\u0131n \u0130pek ile ByLock arkada\u015f\u0131 oldu\u011fu belirtilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

Kuseyri’nin FET\u00d6 eleba\u015f\u0131n\u0131n avukatlar\u0131ndan Abdulkadir Aksoy’\u0131n yan\u0131nda bir s\u00fcre \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan Kuseyri, Bankasya’ya talimatla 3 milyon TL’den fazla para yat\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

FET\u00d6 \u00fcyeli\u011finden 8 y\u0131l 1 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan FET\u00d6’n\u00fcn k\u0131demli avukatlar\u0131ndan Mehmet Rasim Kuseyri’nin, hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":28016,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4596],"tags":[640,67,3613],"yoast_head":"\n