\u00dcnl\u00fc baklavac\u0131ya 8 y\u0131l 9 ay ceza verilmi\u015fti<\/h1>\n

Faruk G\u00fcll\u00fc<\/strong>, Fethullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n (FET\u00d6\/PDY) i\u015f d\u00fcnyas\u0131ndaki yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda yarg\u0131lan\u0131yordu. \u00dcnl\u00fc baklavac\u0131, 12 \u015eubat 2020 tarihinde, \u201csilahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak\u201d su\u00e7undan 8 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131 alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Faruk G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn cezas\u0131, 5 Kas\u0131m’da istinaf <\/strong>mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan onand\u0131. \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 2. Ceza Dairesi, G\u00fcll\u00fc’ye verilen hapis cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunu inceledi. Ceza dairesinin dosya \u00fczerinden yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 inceleme sonucunda, yerel mahkemenin vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu h\u00fck\u00fcm, usul ve yasaya uygun bulundu. Delillerde ve i\u015flemlerde herhangi bir eksiklik olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar veren mahkemenin karar\u0131nda, ispat bak\u0131m\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirmenin yerinde oldu\u011fu ve eylemin do\u011fru olarak nitelendirildi\u011fin alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi. Kararda, G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019ye verilen 8 y\u0131l 9 ayl\u0131k hapis cezas\u0131n\u0131n kanuni ba\u011flamda uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Faruk G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn avukat\u0131n\u0131n ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sebepler, daire taraf\u0131ndan yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcnmedi ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n istinaf ba\u015fvurusu esastan reddedildi. Daire taraf\u0131ndan oy birli\u011fiyle al\u0131nan karar, Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a temyiz yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere g\u00f6nderildi. G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn dosyas\u0131 temyiz incelemesi i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a iletildi.<\/p>\n

Faruk G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn dava ge\u00e7mi\u015fi<\/h2>\n

FET\u00d6\u2019n\u00fcn i\u015f d\u00fcnyas\u0131 yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na y\u00f6nelik soru\u015fturma<\/a> kapsam\u0131nda, TUSKON hakk\u0131nda iddianame haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan iddianamede, san\u0131k Faruk G\u00fcll\u00fc<\/strong>\u2019n\u00fcn \u201csilahl\u0131 ter\u00f6r \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcne \u00fcye olmak\u201d su\u00e7undan 7,5 y\u0131ldan 15\u2019er y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

FET\u00d6<\/strong> eleba\u015f\u0131 Fethullah G\u00fclen\u2019in de aralar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu 86 san\u0131kl\u0131 davan\u0131n 7 Ekim 2019 tarihli duru\u015fmas\u0131nda, G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn dosyas\u0131 ayr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Daha sonra, 12 \u015eubat 2020\u2019de, \u0130stanbul 23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi taraf\u0131ndan yarg\u0131lanan G\u00fcll\u00fc, 8 y\u0131l 9 ay hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. G\u00fcll\u00fc\u2019n\u00fcn, 3,5 y\u0131ld\u0131r cezaevinde olmas\u0131 sebebiyle tutuklu kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcre mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurulmu\u015f, sa\u011fl\u0131k sorunlar\u0131 da dikkate al\u0131narak yurt d\u0131\u015f\u0131na \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131ndan olu\u015fan adli kontrol tedbirleri uygulanm\u0131\u015f ve tahliyesi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u201c\u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fcn de\u011firmenine su ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir\u201d<\/h2>\n

\u0130stanbul 23. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesinin gerek\u00e7eli karar\u0131nda, \u015fu ifadelere yer verilmi\u015fti:<\/p>\n

“San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctle canl\u0131 ve ge\u00e7i\u015fken organik ba\u011f kurdu\u011fu, bu organik ba\u011f\u0131n emir ve talimat almaya ve vermeye m\u00fcsait bir hiyerar\u015fi ili\u015fkisi do\u011furdu\u011fu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fctle ili\u015fkisinin yakalanma g\u00fcn\u00fc olan 18 A\u011fustos 2016 tarihine kadar devam etti\u011fi, \u00f6rg\u00fctle s\u00fcreklilik arz edecek bir ili\u015fki i\u00e7inde oldu\u011fu, FET\u00d6<\/strong>\/PDY’nin legal g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcml\u00fc illegal STK yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 i\u00e7erisinde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn finans aya\u011f\u0131na hizmet eden piramidal dikey yap\u0131lanmas\u0131na g\u00f6re ikinci kattaki ‘sad\u0131k tabaka’ i\u00e7inde yer ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, deyim yerindeyse san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilerek ve isteyerek \u00f6rg\u00fct\u00fcn de\u011firmenine su ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n

KAYNAK: FET\u00d6 GER\u00c7EKLER\u0130<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00dcnl\u00fc baklavac\u0131ya 8 y\u0131l 9 ay ceza verilmi\u015fti Faruk G\u00fcll\u00fc, Fethullah\u00e7\u0131 Ter\u00f6r \u00d6rg\u00fct\u00fc\/Paralel Devlet Yap\u0131lanmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n (FET\u00d6\/PDY) i\u015f d\u00fcnyas\u0131ndaki yap\u0131lanmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":51852,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4596],"tags":[1439,80,5097],"yoast_head":"\n